Archive | Special Editions RSS for this section




From W.U Hstry want to say a very special Thank You! To all of our fans, followers on Twitter and Facebook, and blogger friends that support us and make this worth while!


Also we wanted to thank some of the people who kindly have done some updates for us, such as Kevin Lewis, Stephen Etheridge or Gordon McKelvie. In addition we thank, all of the people who have agreed to have an interview or a quick chat with us so far: Bex Lewis, Ryan Lavelle, David Rymill, Barbara Yorke, Alf Ragnar Nielssen, Siân Hewlett, Eric Lacey, Tom Olding, Julian Humphrys, Peter Konieczny and Sandra Alvarez, Chris Aldous, Elena Woodacre, Emiliano Perra, Mark allen, Michael Hicks, and Simon Sandall.


And finally, I would like to say thanks to Karl, Scott, Alex, Ali, Sam, Tom, Katy, Jess, Matt, Ellie and James for being an excellent team keeping this thing running! (And to those who used to be part of us, thanks for getting us started!).


So, in general, a big, huge and honest THANK YOU!



2012: The Year in Which the World Did Not Come to an End…

I believe one of the very first updates of this year was about the Mayans, that wonderful civilization that according to the popular culture paranoia predicted the end of the world in 2012. However, if you are reading this is only because those believes were wrong. So, it makes one wonder, what has been the deal with 2012? Was it all about that prediction? Did people only focus on that? Well, let’s take a look.

Thanks to the Google device known as Zeitgeist, we can tell you the world top search trends related with events that happened this year. I think the words on their own summarise quire well what has been going on, and what has captured the attention of many citizens: the death of Whitney Houston, Hurricane Sandy and Typhoon Bopha, Ipad 3, Diablo 3 (which was a total disappointment for most of the geek-gaming culture…just saying…), Kate Middleton, the Presidential debate and US elections, the phenomenon of Gangnam Style (yes, another example of globalisation, Korean music rocking the European and American market, isn’t that exciting?), and finally the Olympics and the Diamond Jubilee. Some other issues have been making a big impression on a global or more national level. I do not think anyone has forgotten yet about George Osborne taxation of pasties (…there goes student budget…Again!!…), or the debate around the EU wining the Peace Nobel Prize.

Bad news travel fast, and so we have heard all about the Greek crisis, and the ongoing problems between Israel and Palestine, the several coup d’etat (Mali, Bissau…), the India Blockouts, etc. Nonetheless, as many of you might now already, here in W.U Hstry we do not like to keep in mind those bitter ends. As historians we appreciate the gravity of such matters, but it would not be fair to only think about the “Bad Stuff”. Thankfully, the human race is still capable of doing good things, that most time we forget. Let me give you an example. Have you heard about the wonderful scientific advances we had this year? We have discovered a world with four suns, performed further investigations into DNA studies, and successfully done a  twenty-four electrode bionic eye implantation! It is true that some other sad news have shacken the world of science this year. Unfortunately, the last specimen of the Pinta Island Tortoise, known as Lonesome George died, and with him his whole subrace. Bur perhaps knowing these issues are making us more natural-environmental conscious. This whole Cataclysm theory about the end of the world should not pass without reminding us that maybe our fears had a logical basis. For this reason, I wish that the extension to complete the Kyoto Protocol (2020) will work this time.

U.K: the Nation that Rocked 2012

In case you haven’t noticed the U.K has been a cause for news several times this year. Just for that reason, I am going to dedicate the following lines to remark important events in British History (for good or bad). I know we do mention a fair bit of British/English history in here, but that is because there is SO MUCH HISTORY in the U.K. And sometimes, in eras of uncertainty, it is nice to remember those moments. It is not about nationalism, do not mistake my words, rather it is about the collective memory, why these things are important? Why do we remember them? Well, because they had an impact that shaped the British society of the time, and perhaps has a repercussion in current times. So here it is:

-10 years ago the charity Cancer Research UK was founded. On top of that, the Mary Rose was rescued from the sea 30 years ago. Also, it is the 70th anniversary of the premiere of Cassablanca, and curiously enough, the 75th of The Hobbit’s publication! (Tolkien fans, 2012 IS a Great Year!). Finally, it is interesting to know that 80 years ago the BBC Empire Service started broadcasting, and that 2012 is the 90th anniversary of the Anglo-Irish Treaty.

-Moving into the hundreds anniversaries, a variety of important historical events took place in this time frame. It has been a 100 years since the introduction of U.K miners minimum wage, but about the same time period since the sinking of the Titanic and the tragic outcome of Robert Falcon Scott and his team at the South Pole. But on a lighter note, it was 150 years ago when both the U.K and the U.S agreed to suppress slave trade. Also, it was 200 year ago when the Luddites attacked a wool production factory in Yorkshire. Finally, 2012 would have been the 200th birthday of Charles Dickens.

What Does the Rest of the World Have to Commemorate?

…Probably too many things to be listed in here. However, here is a selection of those facts that have caught my attention.

-It has been 200 years since the Peace of Bucharest, that ended the conflict between Russia and the Ottoman Empire. 1812 was also a very important year for the Spanish as they produced their new constitution (since then symbol of freedom and liberalism) in Cadiz, during the French occupation.

-500 year ago Martin Luther became doctor in theology and joined the theological faculty of Wittemberg. (What came after that you all know). It was as well the first time the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel was opened to the public, and the year in which Amerigo Vespucci died.

-It is the 1000th anniversary of Mael Morda rebellion against Brian Boru, and the birth of the Tibetan translator of holy scriptures, Marpa Lotsawa.

-In the year 12 A.D Augustus ordered the invasion of the germanic lands trespassing the Rhine, and a very peculiar figure was born: Caligula. On a final note, I thought it was interesting, considering this whole Mayan prophecy, that in 12 B.C the comet Halley made an appearance…

These are some facts about 2012. For sure there are many more. We hope you will keep in mind the good ones tonight around 23:59 pm and enter the New Year with a smile on you face. We certainly will do. 2012 has been a very interesting year for us (Second birthday and all!), we can only hope you had as much fun as we did, and much more for 2013!


Some websites you might find interesting:

‘Technology review of the year 2012′, The Telegraph

’2012 in review: an interactive guide to the year that was’, The Guardian

‘Entertainment review of the year: 2012′, BBC News

‘Point of View: Why 2012 is a year to remember’, BBC News

GUEST POST!-The Curse of Babel and the Study of Medieval History, by Kevin Lewis

Today, we have a special guest post for you written by Kevin Lewis!!!! The post you will be able to find it right below this announcement. As in previous occasions, we are only transmitting Kevin’s work to you, we have not altered his work, or anything. This is his own paper and contribution, all the merit and grace of this update is owed to him. So if you love it, CONGRATULATE HIM FOR SUCH A BRILLIANT TEXT! (I personally found it very interesting!)***************************************************************************************************************

In the famous Hereford Mappa Mundi, the Tower of Babel of Genesis stands not far from Jerusalem, the very centre of the world. Contemplating this beautiful work, one observes that the Tower is still standing, still stretching upwards for an invasion of Heaven that never came, for God has yet to cast it down in anger, to shatter it and the one language of humankind forever into so many tiny shards. This story of the confusion of tongues has particular relevance for the study of History, especially of the Middle Ages.

Contemporaries were very much aware of the sheer multiplicity of languages in use at the time. The number of divergent languages in Europe came as a particular surprise to Rashid al-Din, writing in Persia in the fourteenth century. Certainly, many more people would have been multilingual than they are today, at least in the Anglophone world. A reasonably educated English priest in 1100 would have known the English of the Anglo-Saxons, the French of the recent conquerors, and the Latin of the Church. Even a peasant is likely to have known a few regional dialects of English – picked up in an age long before such powerful influences as Chaucer, Shakespeare and Samuel Johnson inadvertently united and standardised the language – as well as a smattering of French and very likely the Latin Pater Noster, if nothing else of prayer and liturgy. As for highly cosmopolitan regions such as Byzantine Constantinople, Fatimid Alexandria or Crusader Acre, where the merchants of the known world congregated, still more languages were in play.

David Morgan’s standard work, The Mongols (1986), includes a lengthy discussion of the uniquely acute linguistic difficulties encountered when attempting to study the Mongol Empire as a whole: a vast domain stretching from Korea to Poland, recorded primarily in the multiple languages of the conquered peoples of Eurasia, rather than in the language of the conquerors themselves. Not even the most gifted of polyglots can be expected to master Chinese, Arabic, Latin and all the languages in between. This forces any historian seeking to view the Empire as a totality to rely to a great extent upon translations and the secondary literature of others. The key problem is that such modern intermediaries essentially represent yet another degree of separation between the historian and the people and events he or she is striving to understand.

One does not need to study the Mongols to recognise that the study of even the smallest, most geographically specific corner of the Medieval World is dependent upon the acquisition of specialist linguistic skills. Research into early Islamic Egypt is likely to require Coptic, Arabic and Greek. A study of thirteenth century Yorkshire necessitates Latin and Norman French. And of course this is not to mention the various languages required for the ever expanding body of secondary literature. English, French and German are usually indispensable, with others dependent upon the research area itself, be it Italian for Norman Sicily or Spanish for the Reconquista. Unfortunately, linguistic training has never figured anywhere near as prominently in the teaching of Medieval History as in related disciplines such as Classics or Oriental Studies.

As researchers, there is little we can do but to gather as many bricks of Babel as possible in our constant striving for understanding of the texts upon which we base our work. Even then, much research will still be found wanting, lacking the depth of engagement with each and every relevant language: the ability not only to recognise the subjunctive and the ablative absolute when we encounter them in the wild, but also to appreciate more fully the subtleties of each and every language in their diverse ironies, idioms and obscurely humorous turns of phrase.

One practical route worth exploring may be the greater encouragement of collaborative work. In the natural sciences, it is very common for doctoral students to work towards their degrees as part of larger teams working on joint projects, often alongside more senior researchers. This is not entirely alien to Medieval History and the Humanities generally, but it is comparatively rarer. I personally know only one fellow doctoral student engaged in such a project. Certainly, such group work would not be relevant or useful for every researcher or topic, and there is always the risk that the encouragement of such collaborations could discourage individuals from the crucial task of studying languages for themselves, but I cannot help but feel that an increased level of institutional support for such projects could do much to alleviate the curse of Babel.

Kevin Lewis

Hertford College, University of Oxford

November 2012



12/12/2012, what a wonderful day to celebrate!

Today in W.U Hstry we are all very excited! The reason behind it is that two years ago, a group of enthusiasts, history students from the University of Winchester decided to start this blog you are reading right now as an extra curricular activity. History for the sake of history. History because we love it. History “because it’s there” as George Mallory said about climbing up mount Everest.

So from here, we all wish to THANK YOU! THANK YOU W.U HSTRY FANS! Thank you wonderful people that have seen us grow, that have read our posts, that have commented and share experiences.

Thanks to all the people that have helped us through and give us their support: teachers, fellow historians, members of the public, friends and families. This wouldn’t have been worth it, if it wasn’t because of you!

We hope you have enjoyed our blog so far and that you will carry on following our updates, which will be many more to come!

Kind Regards from everyone!


W.U.Hstry Team


Guest Post- Stephen Etheridge, PhD Student at the University of Huddersfield (Part 3)

What is life a part-time PhD research student like?

Firstly it is true that PhD study is isolating. This is even more so when you are part time. Whether full or part-time the key to success is motivation, work, and getting your research known within the wider academy. The days of undergraduate study, where you have almost daily contact with your tutors, mentors, peers, and friends are gone. You need to be prepared to work alone and unsupervised for long periods of time. Naturally, the temptations for distraction are there, day-time television, afternoon naps, and the Xbox. That’s before we even consider that part-time students often have to fit their research in around a full-time job. There are plenty of guides for motivation and time management. All I will say is you will feel like giving up at some point. There will be days when you just can’t face the thing, however, there will also be days when you feel on top of the world, and, I like to think these outnumber the lows. Remember, this is a big project and you are in it for the long haul. Writing a PhD has highs and lows, sometimes you will achieve a lot, sometimes very little, the key is to always try and be moving forwards. Have the reasons why you want to do a PhD clearly laid out in your mind: write them down and pin them above your desk.

The first thing to deal with is the isolation. I have seen many research students just hang around campus, but this, especially for historians, is not achieving anything. I believe that a researcher should be in the archives, researching. This is, of course, a lonely pursuit, and, outside writing up the thesis, will be where you are most isolated. However, once you have started writing your first drafts, now is the time to get out there. You can have the most original research in the world but it is useless unless you communicate it to the wider academy. As a part-time researcher I am rarely in my own university, and I communicate with my supervisors regularly by email, but only see them in person perhaps quarterly. Also I am outside the mainstream of the social life of the university, and also have a full-time job to hold down I do, however, regularly attend conferences and seminars at other universities, often aiming to give a paper myself. This is where you meet other researchers, who, you will find, share all the same problems that you do. You find that you are not alone in your worries. I would also recommend giving talks to groups outside academia, a local history society, for example. These networks often have access to archives that you would not think about. In short, you can be as isolated as you want to be. The responsibility to maintain your social and research networks really does rest with you. Once you get out there the help, advice and encouragement can be overwhelming.

Secondly, there will be a day when you will face a real drubbing. Your theories, concepts and ideas will be torn apart, perhaps when you have your first article rejected, or, after you give a conference paper. You can rest assured that this will happen and it will be awful. Don’t panic and don’t throw you work in the canal. This happens to everyone and it is part of the research process. Believe it or not your work will benefit and become stronger, more centered and clear as a result. Always remain professional. Never ever lose your temper or get into an argument, and never email an editor saying they are wrong to reject your article.( I haven’t, by the way) Always bear in mind that whatever you are going through other researchers are going through it as well. If there is a constant theme to life as a PhD researcher then it is, ‘you are not alone.’

Finally, I don’t believe there is such a thing as a part-time PhD. The research process will take over your life. Even if you are not in the archives, writing, or at a conference, then you are thinking about the thesis. This is good, however, it can make you a nuisance to live with. When was the last time you spoke to your nearest and dearest and did not stop mid-sentence because a PhD thought popped into your head? Take time out, do things with your friends, family and partners. Believe it or not try and get a hobby. Doing a PhD is overwhelming for everyone, not just yourself, don’t ignore your friends. In the end the PhD process is one of the most rewarding and frustrating experiences you can go through, when I, perhaps not very long from now, emerge the other side, I will happily say it was worth it.

13 Martin Stokes, (Ed) Introduction in, Ethnicity, identity: the musical construction of place (Berg: Oxford, 1994), p. 6.

Stephen Etheridge, GLCM, MA

Guest Post- Stephen Etheridge, PhD Student at the University of Huddersfield (Part 2)

Your early experiences helped you choose a topic, but why use the brass band movement as a way of understanding working-class identity, what was the gap in the research?

My research uses the brass band to fill a gap between musicology and social history. Whilst some work had been done to fill this gap, a great deal of work remains. Dave Russell made a call for the need to study music to understand social history, and the need to embrace an interdisciplinary approach, in his 1993 article, ‘The ‘social history’ of popular music: A label without a cause?’ Popular Music, 12/2, (May 1993). Significant inroads were made by the ‘Music and Cultures Research Group’, consisting of: Trevor Herbert, Martin Clayton and Richard Middleton, based at the Open University’s Music Department, in Milton Keynes, active from 1995-2003. The group’s stated purpose was, ‘to pursue research in the cultural study of music, with an emphasis on interdisciplinary approaches drawing on musicology, social history, anthropology, ethnomusicology, cultural theory and other relevant areas.’1 The group was important in arranging conferences and seminars that pushed forward this research.2 The key text that resulted from this group was, Martin Taylor, Trevor Herbert and Richard Middleton, (Eds), The Cultural Study of Music: A Critical Introduction (New York, 2003), ‘a collection of essays covering many aspects of the conjunction between music and culture.’3 It is worthwhile quoting from the book proposal to the publishers of this collection to see the importance of music in the study of social history, and how my research is an important contribution to an emerging interdisciplinary field, they wrote:


A tendency to increasing concern with ‘culture’ has been manifested in music scholarship for some time, and in a variety of ways. It would be too much to say that various trajectories are converging, let alone that all will crystallize into a single field of ‘cultural musicology’. Nonetheless, different approaches are interacting, and with increasing intensity, such that it is clear that a new paradigm may well be on the horizon. All the disciplines involved in the study of music will continue to be changed by this process and, for some, reconfiguration seems inevitable.4


Whilst brass bands are only a small part of popular music, the social history of music, popular or otherwise, is where the social historian should turn to reveal the working class and regional identities of the brass band movement. The researcher, however, should be aware that this starting point overlaps many historiographies that deal with working class and regional identities. Nevertheless, these problems of interpretation of analysis attracted me to this research. If we subscribe to the powerful argument of Taylor, Herbert and Middleton’s, and I do, when they asked the question, ‘does anyone still believe that musicology is the study of the scores of the great masters and nothing more?’ and that, ‘aren’t we all, to a greater or lesser extent, ‘culturists’ now?’5 Then, as my research explores, the brass band needs to be re-examined to gain a full understanding of working-class culture. It would be naïve to say that every working-class person in the Southern Pennines, or the nation, was touched by the brass band. The attraction of analysing brass bands, however, is that they were tangible links to the daily, weekly, monthly, and annual lives of many working people. Brass bands were constantly present at events that drew people together such as, agricultural shows, fairs, old peoples’ treats, sports days, charitable events, and Whitsuntide holiday walks.6 These events marked out the rhythms of work, leisure, and community life in the Southern Pennines. The base of this rhythm was the long sweep of history, a sweep that seemed almost changeless: it was the history of people and their surroundings. It was the histories of social groups, in this case the brass bands and their extended networks, and finally, the history of individuals, in this case bandsmen, and the rhythms of their daily lives.7 The long sweep of history associated itself with the long duration of seasonal and natural growth that evolved very slowly. Then the bands played out there actions in ‘social time’ that related to not only the social lives of the bandsmen, but also how the bands acted and interacted within their communities and beyond. Brass bands created social networks in communities that become important in historical interpretation. This is because these networks were relatively stable, creating dynamism and flux among communities and settlements, such as villages, towns, regional centers, peripheries and the capital, together, with, as Rachel Cowgill and Peter Holman pointed out, what were essentially local venues and institutions, such as, ‘taverns ,assembly rooms, town halls, cathedrals, churches, chapels and individuals, via personal familial and professional ties.’8 Finally, the history of individuals in the bands is how the bandsmen coped with the pleasures and strains of daily life.9 As Tim Carter argues, music became a historical archive that was placed on a sure enough footing to ‘enable it to speak to the broader worlds of political, economic, social and cultural history.’10 Music, and the social networks that grew from its performance, became an archive as valid as political coverage, newspaper reporting or personal diaries. As Simon Dentith argues ‘social relationships are partly realised in culture, and that culture is a space where such relationships are both cemented and contested.’11 A study of the social networks that grew from the bands in this area will define the authentic and essential elements of social identity that grew from brass band music in the north. As Martin Stokes argues when discussing the musical construction of place we will, ‘be able to question how music is used by social actors in specific local situations, to erect boundaries, to maintain distinctions between us and them’.12 Therefore, it is to the Industrialised area of the Southern Pennines that my research turns and by examining the brass band we gain a new perspective on the working class in this period.

2Literature and Music in the Study of Culture, at Worcester College Oxford, 11 May 2002, Music and Literature in the 19th and 29th Centuries, Open University in London, 5 May 2001, Hosting the annual conference of the British Forum for Musicology, on the theme, Music and Meaning, at Milton Keynes on 14 November 1998,and the group’s first conference, Music Studies and Cultural Difference, was held in London in 1997 <>

4 Martin Taylor, Trevor Herbert and Richard Middleton, (Eds.), The Cultural Study of Music: a critical introduction (New York, 2003), p. 1.

5 Taylor, Herbert and Middleton, p. 3.

6 For an example of the range of community activities brass bands played at see, Helmshore Brass Band Minute Books, November 1889-September 1911, held at Accrington Local Studies Library.

7 F. Braudel, On History, translated by S. Matthews (London, 1980), pp. 3-14, in, Richard Whipp, ‘’A time to every purpose’: an essay on time and work’, in, Patrick Joyce (Ed), The Historical Meanings of Work (Cambridge 1987, this edition 1989), pp. 213-214.

8 Rachel Cowgill and Peter Holman (Eds), Music in the British Provinces, 1690-1914 (Ashgate, 2007), pp. 2-3.

9 Whipp, ‘A time to every purpose’, pp. 213-214.

10 Tim Carter, ‘The sound of silence: models for an urban musicology’, Urban History, 29/1, (2002), p. 9.

11 Simon Dentith, Society and Cultural Forms in Nineteenth-Century England (Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1998), 1.

12 Martin Stokes, (Ed) Introduction in, Ethnicity, identity: the musical construction of place (Berg: Oxford, 1994), p. 6.

Guest Post- Stephen Etheridge, PhD Student at the University of Huddersfield (Part 1)

HOWDY EVERYONE! I am please to introduce you to our first guest blogger! STEPHEN ETHERIDGE. So today I will be posting this in his behalf as a contribution to our blog, (isn’t that nice of him?). Please note that this update will take the space of various posts. The information provided in the following lines has all been written by him, I am being basically just the messenger. I hope you enjoy it. If you would like to know more about him get in contact and we will pass your interest to him. ENJOY.


Stephen Etheridge

PhD Student

School of Music, Humanities and Media

University of Huddersfield

Stephen Etheridge is a part-time PhD research student in social history and musicology at the University of Huddersfield. His thesis title is, ‘Slate Grey Rain and Polished Euphoniums.’ The Pennine Brass Band, 1840-1914, Social and Cultural Influences on Working-Class and Northern Identities. Stephen’s research explores contested and popular themes in social history and musicology to explain why, when the brass band movement was a national movement, in the popular imagination, the brass band movement became a metonym for working-class and northern identities in this period. Stephen uses the Pennine brass band to explore a number themes that contributed to the construction of working-class identities that emerged from the mid-nineteenth-century onwards, such as, community, rational recreation and social control, regional identity, working-class leisure, the links between musical performance and class identity, and musical hierarchies and masculinity. Stephen has presented over twenty talks and conference papers to local history groups and academic conferences about his research. He has recently finished jointly-editing, and contributing to, a new collection of essays that challenges accepted norms about the study of labour history, which is due to be released in October. (Anne Baldwin, Chris Ellis, Stephen Etheridge, Keith Laybourn and Neil Pye (Eds) Class Culture and Community: New Perspectives in Nineteenth and Twentieth Century Labour History (Cambridge Scholars Publishing, Newcastle-Upon-Tyne, 2012)) We asked Stephen how he came to be a PhD researcher, the reasons for his research, and his experiences of being a part-time PhD student.

How did you pick a research topic?

As a teenager I played the trombone in a number of brass bands around Staffordshire. I later went to Leeds College of Music and ended up following a different musical path, nevertheless, this early experience introduced me to the brass band movement, its traditions, values, and customs. These experiences stayed with me throughout my musical career. I don’t think many people plan a PhD and I feel that occasionally something happens that starts a chain of events that results in an idea. For me, this was picking up a second-hand copy of E.P. Thompson’s classic The Making of the English Working Class (1963) and being influenced by his argument that history was made by the ordinary person. As Thompson argued, class was not a thing, but was largely defined by the productive-and social- relations into which people were born. Thompson wrote, ‘Class-consciousness is the way in which these experiences are handled in cultural terms: embodied in traditions, value-systems, ideas, and institutional forms.’ 1On reading this, the first thing I thought was working-class brass bands have not been explored enough in terms of working-class culture.

Nevertheless, it was not until 2004, when I had the opportunity to study for a part-time master’s degree in social history, that I put this idea into practice. I felt that the brass band movement could shed new light on how the working-class lived their lives from the nineteenth-century onwards. You could say that I was using the writer’s cliché of, ‘write what you know.’ Influenced by Thompson I began my dissertation. Naturally, when I finished my master’s degree I felt there was a lot more research to be undertaken, and so I eventually ended up beginning my PhD at Huddersfield early in 2007. Clearly, I have read widely and have many more influences, Thompson, however, remains the core idea in my work. So, if I had not gone into Oxfam and bought his book I would not be here. In short, for me, PhD theses ideas do not come fully formed they develop over time, and from some unexpected events.

1 E.P. Thompson, The Making of the English Working Class (London, 1963, this edition,1991), pp. 8-9.

QUIZ ANSWERS! And the Winner Is…

Ok everyone; it is time to know the answers for our Olympics, Sports & History Quiz!! Also, we will announce who is the winner so this person can actually dare us to write about a certain topic, whatever they choose!

            PART 1

  1. The First Ancient Olympic Games did take place in Olympia, 776 BC.
  2. The First Female Athlete to become and Olympic Champion was Cynisca of Sparta, who was a princess to said Greek city-state, and she obtained a bronze statue in the chariot race competition.
  3. The Founder of the International Olympic Committee was the Baron Pierre de Coubertin.
  4. In the 20th century there have been 3 Olympic Games cancelled due to bellicose conflicts: in 1916, 1940 and 1944, (the impact of WW1 and WW2).
  5. The First Proper Olympic Games that took place in Modern Times were those of 1896, in Athens and were known by the name of the Games of the I Olympiad.
  6. And for those who did not know, London has been an Olympic city 2 more times: in 1908 and in 1948 (should have been before that but those were one of the games cancelled during WW2).


  1. Apart from the French, it was the Inuits from Greenland the ones who started the handball mania!
  2. It was Diego de Valera, a Spanish writer and historian from the 15th Century the one that wrote down the rules for modern fencing.
  3. For this question, you should blame King Edward III for banning hockey. And just as a curiosity it does seem that James II of Scotland did try and ban hockey too, but English monarch was already a pioneer in such modality.
  4. The three cultures that were dexterous in pole vaulting were (Surprise, surprise): The Greeks, the Cretans and the Celts!
  5. That beautiful sport that is Synchro Swimming had its first recorded competition at Berlin in 1891.
  6. I know all those 3 names sounded really daffy in a way or another, but believe it or not, the original name of Volleyball was Mintonette indeed!
  7. The tough exercise that the Norwegian soldiers had to fulfil as an alternative to their military training was Biathlon. It appears that, in fact, one of the first ski clubs to be created in Norway around 1860 was the Trysil Rifle and Ski Club, which tried to promote the defense of the country at a local level.
  8. For those who did not know, the national sport of Korea by excellence is Taekondo, not Judo or Aikido. It is their specialty, their number 1 sport.
  9. Now, I am quite fond of Rhythmic Gymnastics as I practiced it for a long time, and it is a competition a never miss. Though, I have to admit that perhaps the question was a bit cheeky, but just so you know the first gymnast to win the gold in an Olympic Game was a Chinese-Canadian woman called Lori Fung. She obtained her medal in the games of L.A, 1984. Since then, it seems that the eastern European countries have the monopoly of this sport.
  10. And finally, the revival of Archery as a practice and sport took place in the 18th Century.


These are the answers to our questions. I hope you found it entertaining as well as informative.

And, before you leave, it is time to announce the winner. I said the Quiz Champion would be whoever had the highest number of right answers. Well, this is the ranking:

-Contestant alias “Carlos”-11

-Contestant alias “Martin”-6

-Contestant alias “Paula.Ct”-4

-Contestant alias “Eyre”-3

-Contestant alias “Chuspi”-2


WELL OUR TEST HAS BEEN PROVED TO BE HARD! I’m glad partially. Anyways, thanks to everyone who took the test, well done, and congratulations “Carlos”, you are up for the challenge!


OK, here I come with the second batch of questions. Are you ready? I have decided to make this more exciting. If any of you gets a very high score, of having ALL of the answer right (without cheating) OR MOST of the answers right (1-7 errors) WE WILL dedicate personally a post to this person. Topic to be chosen by the fortunate follower of W.U Hstry to be a master mind in this field! What do you say? A challenge for you, a challenge for us!

Well, as I promised, here it comes:


This is the full list. As I said above, give it a go, leave a comment with your answers and I’ll keep you posted to know th results!!





Well, I was thinking about what to write for this week. I had many ideas, but none of them seemed really attractive. So I had this random idea, and I thought “what if I do a quiz about the olympics and its sports?”. And that is what I am going to do. I am going to post the different questions with their possible answers in here and then in a week or so, I will post the right answers and other comments I might have to say about this.

It is an experiment, I hope it goes well and you find in interesting and challenging.

We will start with the “easy” ones first and then a bit of everything. Let’s see how it goes! Good luck and do not cheat, it will lose its charm if you do so!



Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 442 other followers